Return to Return to Return to
There are eight assessment criteria which are used to asses your lab work .
Each candidate will be assessed at least twice in each of the eight criteria. The two marks for each of the criteria are added together to determine the final mark out of 48 for the IA component. This will then be scaled at IBCA to give a total out of 24%.
For a particular criterion, a piece of work is judges to see whether the requirements of each aspect have been fulfilled completely, partially or not at all. This will then be translated into an achievement level o,1,2,or 3 using the achievement level matrixes below.
|
Level |
Defining the problem or research question. |
Formulating a hypothesis or prediction. |
Selecting Variables |
|
Complete |
Identifies a focused problem or research question. |
Relates the hypothesis or prediction directly to the research ch question and explains it, quantitatively where appropriate. |
Selects the relevant independent and controlled variables |
|
Partial |
States the problem or research question, but it is unclear or incomplete. |
States the hypothesis or prediction but does not explain it. |
Selects some relevant variables. |
|
Not at all |
Does not state the problem or research question or repeats the general aim provided by the instructor |
Does not state a hypothesis or prediction |
Does not select any relevant variables |
|
Selecting appropriate apparatus or materials. |
Designing a method for the control of variables |
Designing a method for the collection of sufficient relevant data. |
|
|
Complete |
Selects appropriate apparatus or materials |
Describes a method that allows for the control of the variables |
Describes a method that allows for the collection of sufficient relevant data. |
|
Partial |
Selects some appropriate apparatus or materials |
describes a method that makes some attempt to control the variables. |
Describes a method that allows for the collection of insufficient relevant data. |
|
Not at all |
Does not select any apparatus or materials |
describes a method that does not allow for the control of the variables |
describes a method that does nor allow any relevant data to be collected |
|
Collecting and recording raw data |
Organizing and presenting raw data |
|
|
Complete |
Records appropriate raw data (qualitative and or quantitative), including units and uncertainties where necessary |
Presents raw data clearly, allowing for easy interpretation. |
|
Partial |
Records some appropriate raw data. |
Presents raw data but does not allow for easy interpretation. |
|
Not at all |
Does not record ant appropriate raw data. |
Does not present raw data or presents it incomprehensibly |
|
Processing raw data |
Presenting processed data |
|
|
Complete |
Process the raw data correctly |
Presents data appropriately, helping interpretation and where relevant, takes into account errors and uncertainties |
|
Partial |
Some raw data is processed correctly |
Presents processed data appropriately but with some errors |
|
Not at all |
No processing of raw data is carried out or major errors are made in processing |
Presents processed data inappropriately or incomprehensibly |
|
Drawing conclusions |
Evaluating procedures and results |
Improving the investigation |
|
|
Complete |
Gives a valid conclusion based on the correct interpretation of the results, with an explanation and where appropriate, compares results with literature values |
Evaluates procedures and results including limitations, weaknesses or errors |
Identifies weaknesses and states realistic suggestions to improve the investigation |
|
Partial |
States a conclusion that has some validity |
Evaluates procedures and results but misses some obvious limitations or errors |
Suggests only simplistic improvements |
|
Not at all |
Draws a conclusions that misinterprets the results |
The evaluation is superficial or irrelevant |
Suggest unrealistic improvements |
|
Carrying out techniques Safely |
Following a variety of instructions |
|
|
Complete |
Is competent and methodical in the use of the techniques and the equipment, and pays attentions to safety issues |
Follows the instructions accurately, adapting to new circumstances (seeking assistance when requires) |
|
Partial |
requires assistance in the use of a routine technique. Works in a safe manner with occasional prompting |
Follows the instructions but requires assistance. |
|
Not at all |
Does not carry out the technique or misuses the equipment, showing no regard for safety |
Does not follow the instructions or requires constant supervision. |
|
Works within a team |
Recognizing the contributions of others |
Exchanging and integrating ideas |
|
|
Complete |
Collaborates with others, recognizing their needs, in order to complete the task |
Expects, actively seeks and acknowledges the views of others |
Exchanges ideas with others, integrating them into the task. |
|
Partial |
Requires guidance to collaborate with others. |
Acknowledges some views. |
Exchanges ideas with others but requires guidance integrating them into the task. |
|
Not at all |
Is unsuccessful when working with others. |
Disregards views of others. |
Does not contribute. |
|
Approaching scientific investigations with self-motivations and perseverance |
Working in an ethical manner |
Paying attentions to environmental impact |
|
|
Complete |
Approaches the investigations with self-motivations and follows it through to completion |
Pays considerable attention to the authenticity of the data and information, and the approach to materials (living and non-living=g) |
Pays considerable attentions to the environmental impact of the investigation. |
|
Partial |
Approaches the investigation with self-motivations or follows it through to completion |
Pays some attention to the authenticity of the data and information, and the approach to materials (living and non-living) |
Pays some attentions to the environmental impact of the investigation. |
|
Not at all |
Lacks perseverance an d motivation. |
Pays little attention to the authenticity of the data and information, and the approach to materials (living and non-living) |
Pays little attentions to the environmental impact of the investigation. |
For a particular criterion, a piece of work is judges to see whether the requirements of each aspect have been fulfilled completely, partially or not at all. This will then be translated into an achievement level o,1,2,or 3 using the achievement level matrixes below
Three Aspect Criteria
Planning (a), Planning (b) , Conclusions and Evaluation, Personal Skills (a), Personal Skills (b)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complete |
x . .. . x |
x . .. . x |
x |
||
|
Partial |
...................x |
.........x.........x |
x ......x........x |
||
|
Not at all |
....................x |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complete |
x.................... |
x ................... |
|||
|
Partial |
........ x............ |
....................... |
x.........x............ |
x...................... |
......................... |
|
Not at all |
....................x |
.........x.........x |
....................x |
..........x...........x |
x..........x.........x |
Two Aspect Criteria
Data Collection, Data Processing and Presentation, Manipulitive Skills
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Complete |
x.............x |
x.............. |
x................. |
|||
|
Partial |
..............x |
x...............x |
x................ |
|||
|
Not at all |
...................x |
...................x |
x..............x |